>two pieces of software I guarantee that it was actually one piece of software ran twice. Here is the real problem: there are published standards on English composition. Language models (what idiots call AI) will use these composition models to frame their sentences, as if they were a published professor of an English composition class. Therefore, it is possible that a college student who took a course in English Composition (as required in virtually all general education tracks) could produce language similar to a language *model* constructed from *model* language. The editing pass suggested by grammarly is merely a cherry on top. >I doubt these apps cite any source of her plagiarism. They probably give some nonsense score that is unverifiable. Right on point. A machine is unaccountable, therefore it shall not make decisions.