Maybe the title mention was so you could read the archive? I'd think the best approach is link the archive in the title, then include a link to the original in comment (without mention of any of this in title).
The system does a poor job of pulling "title images" from the archive and as such less people pay attention. Thus the reason I started linking the original source and putting the archive in the comment rather than in the primary link. People like pictures. What can I say?
(post is archived)