WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

275

I'm sure the gov won't exploit this against the public though.

I'm sure the gov won't exploit this against the public though.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Did you watch the video?

The AI can "paint the picture" then it can be seen buy whomever is running the AI.

[–] 6 pts

Clickbait title

The AI didn't paint anything in the video. They merely removed the camera layer. Same pic but with the background removed.

This cannot be installed onto comsumer routers. They do not have the computational power to run the code. Period. End of story. AI is derp. It can do nothing outside of it's programming. This whole "be afraid of AI" thing is starting to get retarded.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Aeye man bad!

It's so dumb. You can see right in the video. They trained the AI to learn what crude readings from the radio corresponded to what positions of people in the room. The precise 3D models of people it output were not things it actually determined from inputs. They are very fuzzy guesses, just showing the precise human models that were fed to it with the visible-light camera. This is a big problem with how AI output is presented, it's precise and coherent even though it's full of uncertainty.

[–] 1 pt

I agree with that last completely, I keep arguing with my kids (adults now) that AI is nothing but a script, a fancy search engine. It spits out what it's programed to spit out. Any AI that even remotely does it's own thinking is a complete racist (realist) within days of being unleashed onto the internet. And you know that just can't be allowed to happen.

[–] 0 pt

Be afraid! Trump!!!!

[–] 1 pt

Trupst the P[L]an goy. AI gunna kill yo' ass

[–] 2 pts

After watching the video, my conclusion doesn't change. So the model data is trained using optical data so it can correlate the WiFi data. The resolution is poor, has no color, cannot identify anyone in particular and is only useful to determine if a large animated object is moving in the space. Much the same way IR detection works.

It would be simple to defeat by adding multiple WiFi signals to interfere with detection. The receiver would need to know how many signals were present. The technique is interesting, but easy to circumvent

[–] 0 pt

That's a fair analysis. However, if you're the door kicker type it would still be a handy tool in your toolbox. I'm sure the tech will improve.

And I'm sure the government will abuse it.

[–] 1 pt

You can count on our criminal government abusing it.