WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

I'm sure the gov won't exploit this against the public though.

I'm sure the gov won't exploit this against the public though.

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts (edited )

As and have pointed out WiFi boxes today, even high end ones, simply don't have the storage, memory, and processing power to run any AI model today. So no this isn't going on your crappy router.

Your WiFi acts as a light source and another antenna array picks up the signal disturbance, shadows in the radio light. Because the light is long wavelength and antennas are also large themselves, what can be "seen" is just large blurry blobs. That is why this is useless unless the target is moving. You can't tell Anon, from grandma, from Frigidaire, if it isn't moving. Even then they can only tell that it's a person not which person or if the short one is a kid or a dog.

Throwing out your router isn't going to solve shit, as the "light source" doesn't have to be in your home. The feds can flashlight your house with radio (radar) and pick up both the back scatter as well as the transmission.

You could "Faraday cage" your house but watch out for the high potential charges if the ground goes faulty.

As stated before, there is thermal, optical, and acoustic spying. If they want to get information they can get it.

Just understand, if it gets physical prepare for and expect attrition to be the order of the day.

[–] 2 pts

Also the images they show are AI-generated after it has been trained on people. It would be like an AI outputting an image of a nigger when your motion detector fires, because it was trained that niggers trigger the motion detector. It's imaginary detail.