WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

5G is harmful and because people cannot prove its safe, its harmful. Same even for 4G. 3G was the last "safe" internet means for smartphones.

[–] 1 pt

Its already proved safe. Only the shills and useful idiots claim otherwise. Modulation is not dangerous. Power + Frequency + area2 is what matters. There's plenty of research confirming its safety spanning decades. Many of these frequencies were in common use decades before shills started pushing 5g nonsense.

What's not safe are devices which exceed certification safety limits, which are rather common. What is not safe is using the device next to your head, largely because it exceeds safety limits. But none of this has anything to do with 3g vs 4g vs 5g. That's but bullshit for shills and the weak minded.

[–] 1 pt

Until there is a long term study, you cannot absolutely know. And there are a few that correlates antennae concentrations in urban areas vs cancer incidence

[–] 0 pt

This is where the shills create illusion of deception - with their own deception. There has in fact been extensive studies on RF energy across a huge swath of spectrum. Technologies like 3g, 4g, and 5g, are simply modulation techniques and standards built around specified RF frequencies and powers. Accordingly, ALL long term studies confirm they are in general extremely safe, with some caveats. Some (far from all) of which I mentioned in my original comment.

For example, microwave communication has been the norm for many decades. Yet no one claimed issue nor has issues been identified. Suddenly with "5g" it's the end of the world using these same frequencies. This is known as "complete horse shit." While these have cooked birds, the birds were well within the published danger zones. Zones which are illegal to enter by humans when powered. Furthermore, 5g greatly expanded the danger zones for humans specifically because the higher frequencies require higher power because they are more easily attenuated by the atmosphere, especially including humidity. Which is a fancy way of saying they lose power faster over distance.

Anyone claiming it has not been extensively studied over long term is either ignorant or a liar. Period.