....so it IS dangerous but its okay because its distant enough? Got it.
....so it IS dangerous but its okay because its distant enough? Got it.
Such is the way with all radiation.
Such is the way with all radiation.
You do know Gamma radiation can be perceived as "harmless" until a certain degree but on a long enough term will screw you right
You do know Gamma radiation can be perceived as "harmless" until a certain degree but on a long enough term will screw you right
Thus the difference between linear no threshold model vs reality. We know LNT is very wrong (yet extremely conservative) but it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. I purposely didn't bring ionizing vs non ionizing into the discussion as people who pretend to be subject matter experts seem to struggle with extremely basic RF (non ionizing) concepts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_no-threshold_model
https://www.osha.gov/non-ionizing-radiation
Regardless, you're way off the original topic.
Thus the difference between linear no threshold model vs reality. We know LNT is very wrong (yet extremely conservative) but it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. I purposely didn't bring ionizing vs non ionizing into the discussion as people who pretend to be subject matter experts seem to struggle with extremely basic RF (non ionizing) concepts.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_no-threshold_model
https://www.osha.gov/non-ionizing-radiation
Regardless, you're way off the original topic.
(post is archived)