Until there is a long term study, you cannot absolutely know. And there are a few that correlates antennae concentrations in urban areas vs cancer incidence
This is where the shills create illusion of deception - with their own deception. There has in fact been extensive studies on RF energy across a huge swath of spectrum. Technologies like 3g, 4g, and 5g, are simply modulation techniques and standards built around specified RF frequencies and powers. Accordingly, ALL long term studies confirm they are in general extremely safe, with some caveats. Some (far from all) of which I mentioned in my original comment.
For example, microwave communication has been the norm for many decades. Yet no one claimed issue nor has issues been identified. Suddenly with "5g" it's the end of the world using these same frequencies. This is known as "complete horse shit." While these have cooked birds, the birds were well within the published danger zones. Zones which are illegal to enter by humans when powered. Furthermore, 5g greatly expanded the danger zones for humans specifically because the higher frequencies require higher power because they are more easily attenuated by the atmosphere, especially including humidity. Which is a fancy way of saying they lose power faster over distance.
Anyone claiming it has not been extensively studied over long term is either ignorant or a liar. Period.
....so it IS dangerous but its okay because its distant enough? Got it.
Such is the way with all radiation.
(post is archived)