Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Twitter’s profitability struggles are a testament to how much waste they were able to afford with big pharma money pouring in.

[–] • 1 pt

This is the topic of an article I'd love to read and should be covered by real journalists across mediums. unfortunately those are in very short supply.

[–] • 3 pts

I read a from January saying big pharma has almost completely stopped paying to advertise on Twitter. The article implies this is because there are problems with Twitter and not the other way around. Apparently the discontinuation of Twitter’s COVID-19 disinformation policy is a problem for big pharma.

[–] • 4 pts

lol, it's so insane. we're seeing the same thing, but drawing wildly different conclusions (with one being total cope and a lie).

Twitter didn't "get bad" under Musk, he simply slowed down the lies masquerading as truth with artificial support from bots and boosting.

I'm sure you agree that Twitter was a propaganda machine and was paid handsomely to be so. It was a source of fake support for shit idea and fake outrage for the truth and differing opinions.

The advertisers can no longer push the lies, so they stop giving money. it's really that simple, but unfortunately for us we live in an empire of lies where truth is treason.

[–] • 3 pts

Why pay for tools that dont work?

[–] • 2 pts

Tear it down and rebuild better

[–] • 2 pts

Fuck (((google))).

[–] • 1 pt

Obviously the article was written by an establishment bootlicker..

Anyhow, they attribute the majority of Twitter’s financial losses to “advertisers leaving” and or Elon’s management skills..

But what I would like to know is how much black op money were they previously being paid by the US intel bureaucracy to function as their digital propaganda waterboy? Because I guarantee they were being paid something, and it probably was no small amount.