WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 18 pts 2y

Good one. Notice what they want is for you to show photo ID to "prove your age." This has NOTHING to do with protecting kids, this has to do with removing anonymity.

[–] 5 pts 2y (edited 2y)

Elon (who appears to be almost entirely, if not entirely CIA-sponsored with all business initiatives) was drum-beating the "we must remove anonymity and verify your identity online" Demshevik mantra even before the Twitter deal was a thought in the global consciousness.

ZOG did not carefully manipulate the entire world into their monopoly of thought just to have that effort destroyed by the desire to remain anonymous online. For the Demshevik court of public opinion to properly function, it's neccessary to ensure you cannot have any privacy.

Bottom line is, the machine learning algo's responsible for bombarding you with Tavistock-Institute inspired mind manipulation techniques require the ability to properly profile you without exerting the capital & energy required to use the built-in backdoors on the spying devices most of you retards use daily.

[–] 1 pt 2y

Exactly. If you're against it they'll say "why? Do you think kids should be groomed online?"

[–] 3 pts 2y

Same old "for the children" bullshit tactic.

[–] 0 pt 2y

And when they pull that concernfaggery you call them out on it - by saying "What relevance does that have to removing anonymity online?"

[–] [deleted] 0 pt 2y

True. "Protecting the kids" is always used for draconian surveillance justification.

[–] 0 pt 2y

And collecting a database of ID

[–] 2 pts 2y

Would be useful if it would work. Of course, it won't.

[–] 5 pts 2y

Next: law requiring all social media users to prove they're 18 or older by sending copy of ID.

[–] 2 pts 2y

It's completely safe!

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 2y

Really probably most likely hardly maybe mostly won't be sold to a 3rd party marketing farm in India.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 2y

Don't want to use a password to sign in?!

Enter phone number

[–] 0 pt 2y

That's an "Ice-pyramid": Slippery slopes in every direction.

[–] 1 pt 2y

Under HB 896, social media sites would also be forced to verify a user’s age with a photo ID

Everyone has to submit a photo id

[–] 0 pt 2y

Sadly, even if it passed it wouldn't work. Parents would just open accounts for their kids. Much like some parents buy cigarettes and alcohol for their kids.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt 2y

Lil geeenyuss needz soeshul meejyah tuh eeengadge wiff iz skool!!

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 2y

Yes give the government the power to control what your children do.

You foolish parents. You are asking for your role to be taken away from you and replaced with government.

Fools.

[–] 1 pt 2y

As useless as gun laws

[–] 0 pt 2y

The text of this bill: https://archive.vn/HAs0G

It indicates that this will ammend Chapter 120 Business and Commerce State Code.

Found here: https://archive.vn/YzMf8

Chapter 120.002 Business and Commerce states that:

(b) This chapter applies only to a social media platform that functionally has more than 50 million active users in the United States in a calendar month.

So as it stands it would only apply to the big social media platforms like Facebook, twitter, and reddit.

I agree that this is absurd because parents should be monitoring their children themselves. But on the other hand, there are a shit load of retarded ultra-liberal parents that release their children into the wild. Keeping these kids from getting brainwashed into the fag cult culture will have positive results for future generations. Whether this is net positive or not is the undetermined factor.

[–] 0 pt 2y

Waste of taxpayer $$$$ and wont even remotely work. Just more broken intrawebs

[–] 0 pt 2y

I think the statement "Children under 18" is somewhat funny since it implies that there are children above 18.

...

Actually, forget it. I'm posting anyway and you can't stop me.