WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

506

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Coal and steam power would be way better and actually help the environment, but who cares anymore

[–] 0 pt

Or just use nuclear. Pebble beds are passively safe, even if the thing is burns or is blown to smithereens.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Yeah but you want Chinese retards running around with a nuclear engine?

[–] 1 pt

You can't put nuclear in any ship that doesn't have massive defensive capabilities or supported by ships that do.

[–] 0 pt

I guess it's a risk, but fuel tankers are already targets. Maybe it will become a thing as weaponized drones become inexpensive and commonplace.

[–] 2 pts

China Merchant Energy Shipping company (CMES) has taken delivery of a new supertanker, whose four large sails will cut down average fuel consumption by nearly 10%.

whenever you see new green technology and china in the same scentence you can guarentee its 100% lies

I mean ... they did just build a 100% Chinese plane ... with 70% western parts. So that's kinda like a 100% homegrown venture, amirite?

Yeah and really how much energy did it take to make those sails?

[–] 0 pt

that isnt quite the right angle. im sure they are just cheap plastic. the real question is, how many hours until they break off and become ocean trash?

or even more "is this even real or is it chinese photoshop and no such thing even exists" the government of china promotes fake technology to make it seem advanced

see here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7CQ0--xfA8