WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

482

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt 2y

I always base my judgement of "news" sources not on my inherent bias but by which of them have the most accurate postings over time.

ZeroHedge has an exemplary record to date and that's why I link to them so often and in my book a hitpiece by (((Wiki))) only gives them more credibility. That whole "article" cites where they are from, who they have relationships with, blah blah blah but never even once does it make a long list of the "conspiracy theories" that have turned out to be factually incorrect.

Fuck the kikes over at (((wiki))) and fuck that kike who posted the link in the first place. When I find a more factual source of information then I will start posting their links, until then ZeroHedge is one of my go-to sites.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt 2y

agreed and the same I will move on when I find a more honest reliable site. I do like the fact they report the virus as dangerous and let the comments about virus dangers remain unlike most websites that cleanse the comment areas so they are narrative compliant like a little bitch would do.