WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

970

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts

5g millimeter wave spectrum enabled this.

Your home router, with enough gain & enough bandwidth, can create a 3d virtual representation of your house and every object in it.. including you.

I've been warning about this for years but the sheep don't give a shit or see the danger of this kind of surveillance capability. Sheep never do, until it's too late.

[–] 19 pts

Batman: The Dark Knight warned me about this shit before you did

[–] 3 pts

My son-in-law: “ If you’re not doing anything wrong what’s the problem?” Yes, He is a neckbeard multi-vaxxed meathead.

[–] 4 pts

'Give me your email login password then, faggot'

[–] 1 pt

My son-in-law: “ If you’re not doing anything wrong what’s the problem?” Yes, He is a neckbeard multi-vaxxed meathead.

"It's not about if you're doing anything wrong... It's if the people who hate you are willing to do something wrong."

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

You guys don't run your ap's behind a firewall you control? I stopped using consumer gear about 5 years ago because there's no way to grantee you control it. Could someone sitting in a van outside the house and having some other receiver which is capable of passively doing the same thing just from the signals emitted by your hardware is more clever imo. They could also sit outside with a military grade thermal scope and mostly accomplish the same thing though.

[–] 5 pts

What black magic are you talking about?

This kind of thing is run at the kernel level, built into the physical CPU as a backdoor by our faggot friends at the NSA.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Well its still going to have to get on a channel to communicate back to their mother ship and there are tools for untangling wifi traffic and you'll see it come across the logs in your firewall if they try to use wan to coms. By consumer gear i mean i switched to using old enterprise hardware for most of my network. juniper managed switches and run a custom built firewall behind the fiber ont. My wifi i use enterprise AP's for.

[–] 2 pts

There were some court documents leaked a while ago that outlined how many Feds (a lot) had been caught masturbating outside people's houses, with some kind of imaging technology that basically enabled enough fidelity that they all couldn't stop wanking in their vans.

That was their remote panty sniffing technology.

[–] 1 pt

Have you inspected your firewall's hardware for malicious code? Sure, you can build your own pfsense machine or whatever, but what's guaranteeing that there's not a WIFI chip on that board using this tech even without you activating the chip?

I mean nothing really but theoretically if you get or have a good USB Software defined radio you would be able to detect any anomalous radio transmissions getting emitted from devices that shouldn't be emitting them.

[–] 1 pt

It's basically a 3d constant scan of everything. You and your surroundings. Think about that.

[–] 0 pt

I've been warning about it too - people don't fucking care. They deserve every loss of liberty they get.

The first clue was when 5G used the similar millimeter waves as those airport body scanners.

[–] 0 pt

It already exists. The upgrade will allow your own personal routers and the new stingray devices to work in tandem to be more widespread.

Hard line your devices and faraday cage your houses.

I remember a superman comic book from decades ago, where some guy tried to hide something from superman by lining an entire room with lead because it was known superman couldn't see through it. Superman caught him in seconds, because when you can see through everything something lined with lead sticks out like a beacon in the night. I can't help but think a faraday cage would face the same issues unless you're in an unregistered house in the middle of a hidden forest somewhere. Certainly ANYONE in suburbia would be flagging themselves as "trouble" for the feds.

[–] 0 pt

In this case, they would have to admit they violated your constitutional rights in order to act, opening themslevs up to being sued. This is why stingray evidence is never used in court and why everyone should be cautious of "parallel reconstruction."

[–] 0 pt

Same with removing the battery from a cell phone...that's GOTTA set off an alarm on Mossad's radar

[–] 3 pts

Yep. Been telling you guys for years about this capability. Even called a shill here for educating on this.

This would formalize and even allow for passive tracking through walls with high precision and resolution.

[–] 2 pts

Everything in movies is conditioning/foreshaddowing. Ive been telling my friend for a while now that the cell phone 3d mapping in Dark Knight Rises is real or in dev

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IRELLH86Edo

Thats how they create conspiracies. "THATS JUST A MOVIE"

[–] 1 pt

Lol it's pretty useless tech, they can't even see the size of my dick, Maroonsaint is eternally miffed.

[–] 0 pt

Tech can only be scaled down so far..

[–] 1 pt

We are pretty good at the nano-scale, IDK what the small deal is.

Wifi 802.11 Biden Fucks you edition

oh hey its that thing that in the dark knight it was agreed no one should ever be allowed to do it.

[–] 0 pt

But we will be able to use Wi-Fi sensing for basic motion detection, such as tracking the flow of people in rooms. We’ll also be able to combine it with other sensors for even more interesting applications.

I worked on a tech similar to this back in 2017. We used your cellphone and an app. Multiple sensors spread throughout the property. It could pinpoint your location, live, within 3 feet.

I proposed multiple ways it could be used for data collection and profit (such as how long people looked at advertisements, when those adverts resulted in a purchase, etc.).

It was also used to help find lost children (if they had an app).

[–] 0 pt

Maybe the tinfoil hat thing isnt a bad idea afterall.

[–] 0 pt

Note that the article didn't bother to go into the applications of the technology, or even make an attempt to sell it as something benefitting consumers.

Load more (9 replies)