I think the case is because they're not disclosing that they're doing so
I think the case is because they're not disclosing that they're doing so
But they do disclose it. You just don't read the text telling you.
I get that the complaint states they don't tell anyone but that will be found false as the wording will be interpreted as only have to tell you once.
But they do disclose it. You just don't read the text telling you.
I get that the complaint states they don't tell anyone but that will be found false as the wording will be interpreted as only have to tell you once.
Courts have found in the past that no one reads the fine print therefore the argument that you said once on page 346 that they're tracking you doesn't fly.
Courts have found in the past that no one reads the fine print therefore the argument that you said once on page 346 that they're tracking you doesn't fly.
(post is archived)