Ya okay, so it's useless subjectivity like I already said, something that AI can't replace because it's meaningless and pointless to begin with. That was a long winded way to repeat what I already stated; truly the reply of a fucking retarded, wannabe artist faggot.
Art should be participatory, not passive. It'd be nice if everyone were being creative and spending their time bringing to life things from the depths of their being rather than consuming and trying to appreciate others' art. Ideally there would be no art, because everything around would be more varied and customized to cater to each person. I think of art as artifact, as in the things we leave behind. That's everything, not just things considered art.
If you're using your potential you won't have time for faggy art appreciation. You'll be busy doing things with the limited time you have.
Exactly, robots can't displace art because you could pretend like anything is art on the spot with some made up bullshit like what you just said.
You shouldn't be caught up with worrying about what's art or not in the first place. It's like fawning over celebrities. It's better to produce things than be stuck just consuming things others make.
"Useless subjectivity"
I remember when a guy asked me to draw his face on paper, and I accidentally failed to draw his right eye properly, I was a bit drunk, so I turned it into a pirate's patch
He then told me that his right eye was blind, that it was an artificial eye, and I didn't notice
Funny how that works, uh?
...
Keep thinking art is what they told you, I couldn't care less
(post is archived)