Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

363

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

How many of this huge corporations are publicly traded?

Ok, I'm fine with private companies banning whoever they want so long as ALL "private" companies can do this.

Time to start putting up signs that say "No Democrat, Niggers, or Jews Allowed" on stores across the nation.

Seriously, it's the same damned thing.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

That's right. Social networks are utilities, not just private companies.

[–] • 0 pt

That faggot is retarded. Just because your company uses tech created by the government or uses tech funded by government research does not mean that company is beholden to the government or to restraints put on govrenment.

These social media platforms are private companies and are absolutely free to pick and choose what they allow on their platform and their dumbassed faggot users agree to that exact thing every time they log in or post content.

Stop using their faggoty shit. Support alternatives to their faggoty shit. And stop demanding government destroy the rights of business owners to operate their companies as they see fit. Governnent is not the solution to this problem. And any steps taken by this clearly corrupt piece of shit governnent will only serve to destroy competition for these platforms and to destroy our rights to free speech, free association, and free business practices.

[–] • 1 pt

Google anda Facebook were both funded by the CIA's venture capitalist group. Last I looked, Google and ABC still had company men among their executives.

They were created specifically to create a loophole, to allow the government to use them where the government is otherwise prohibited from doing so.

[–] • 0 pt

Having employees that moonlight as spooks doesn't make you a governmental entity. Nor does getting capital venture from a front company that spooks use to circumvent accountability.

Getting govrnment money isn't what makes you a governmental organization subject to governmental restraint. You are trying to hammer a square peg into a round hole by twisting legalese. Thats not gonna fly.

There are private companies all over the country that do business with the government, get paid by the government, and/or contract with the government. None of them are the governnent and none of them are beholden to governmental restraint.

Again, don't use Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook. Just stop. They don't control shit. They aren't the problem. At least not from the social media platform aspect. Google and Facebook definitely have vertical monopoly issues, but that's not related to being a governmental entity or a bill of rights (1A) issue. Thats an anti- trust issue related to issues much more broad than their social media aspects.

[–] • 0 pt

Like it or not they were created to control us. Like it or not they control the majority of the town square.

These are huge problems.