Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

891

https://nypost.com/2021/01/08/why-ban-of-realdonaldtrump-proves-twitter-not-just-a-platform/

We know the trick. This does not stop big tech, it helps them kill their competition, because alt-tech cannot survive in an envrionment where they can be sued for 3rd party content. BigTech is the only ones that can deal with the legalities of posting 3rd party content.

They're never going to stop trying to kill the internet.

https://nypost.com/2021/01/08/why-ban-of-realdonaldtrump-proves-twitter-not-just-a-platform/ We know the trick. This does not stop big tech, it helps them kill their competition, because alt-tech cannot survive in an envrionment where they can be sued for 3rd party content. BigTech is the only ones that can deal with the legalities of posting 3rd party content. They're never going to stop trying to kill the internet.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (34).
[–] • 0 pt

poal could be sued for the content here,

Under what premise?

What content here does 230 protect?

[–] • 1 pt

All of it. As soon as someone posts"kill all jews." Poal is sued.

This is all verified with some internet searching, go learn how the law really works.

[–] • 0 pt

Not at all.

Without 230, they have two choices:

1 Act like a phone company
2 Act like a newspaper

Poal would choose the former, and lose some ability to moderate itself. With 230, they can ban and editorialize content like a paper but maintain legal immunity for communications, like a phone company.

[–] • 0 pt

It'll be newspaper, except only the big guys can play.

[–] • 0 pt

go learn how the law really works

So then share with me specifically by which line in the law that is relevant for.

If you're such an expert break it down.

It wouldn't. Because poal isn't acting like a publisher, 230 has no effect anyway.

Facebook for example: IS a publisher. Therefore 230 DOES NOT protect it. THEREFORE THEY CAN be sued for OTHER people's content because it is indistinguishable from their content because as a publisher ALL CONTENT on Facebook is a post by Facebook.

You don't understand anything. You're just being a fucking kike.

[–] • 0 pt

You aren't capable of understanding currently. Publisher and platform are NOWHERE in sec 230.

[–] • 0 pt

Publisher and platform aren't in 230. There is nothing to explain on that.