Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

https://nypost.com/2021/01/08/why-ban-of-realdonaldtrump-proves-twitter-not-just-a-platform/

We know the trick. This does not stop big tech, it helps them kill their competition, because alt-tech cannot survive in an envrionment where they can be sued for 3rd party content. BigTech is the only ones that can deal with the legalities of posting 3rd party content.

They're never going to stop trying to kill the internet.

https://nypost.com/2021/01/08/why-ban-of-realdonaldtrump-proves-twitter-not-just-a-platform/ We know the trick. This does not stop big tech, it helps them kill their competition, because alt-tech cannot survive in an envrionment where they can be sued for 3rd party content. BigTech is the only ones that can deal with the legalities of posting 3rd party content. They're never going to stop trying to kill the internet.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (34).
[–] • -1 pt

I think it's you that is not getting it. I guess you want the baker to bake the case, because that's what you're asking for, to compel a business to provide services.

immune to liability from user generated content, like a phone company, and yet able to determine what speech is and isn't acceptable for publishing, like a newspaper.

THIS. DOES. NOT. MATTER. 230 allows this, the answer would be to reform it, as removing will remove "instant" posting.