WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts (edited )

I'd love to see a side-by-side comparison of the total energy utilization for the 2-acre vertical farm v. the 700-acre flat farm. It's not simply space that's the issue here. Maybe there would be a way to analyze energy input per unit of crop type and do a comparison.

Not only that, I'd like to see a financial comparison. One thing people aren't as likely to consider is the barrier to entry that this will establish, which is why I was interested to know some facts like the costs to operate a farm like Plenty's. Intuitively, we might think that the responsibility for the entire food supply will be concentrated, not across groups of local farmers with accountability to their community, but to a couple of mega corporations.

The space saving is fantastic. The idea of more efficiently utilizing space is awesome. As this technological gap continues to increase, however, I'm interested in the tradeoffs we'll experience at the level of the whole species as these functions become increasingly consolidated to just a few corporate and state powers.

Wait until they tell you that growing your own food crops is illegal because it, I don't know, represents a biological threat that could contaminate all of FutureFoodCorpX's patented high-yield VERTICULT variety. "You selfish bigot. You'd RISK EVERYONE'S ABILITY TO EAT by growing your own food!!!"

[–] 0 pt

Depending on how much energy something like this does use, this is an ideal candidate for a "plop-it-down" off the grid system run on a renewable source.

I'm sure if this kind of farming really becomes common, your questions will get answered by many studies.

[–] 0 pt

Came here to post pretty much what you wrote. Plus; the "concentration" aspect give me eggs-vs-baskets vibes in addition to the 'too easy to switch off' aspect.