WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

817

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Can do,

There have been some bans that some have found questionable, and I have wanted to discuss them but never really have seen a good opportunity to do it, now seemed like an appropriate time.

cc: @Native and @Sw0rdofdamocles.

[–] 2 pts

Have you looked at the sublog or banned user list?

cc: @Native and @Sw0rdofdamocles

[–] 2 pts

Not recently, I'll admit that, however my question is just what is the policy on banning a user?

cc: @Native and @Sw0rdofdamocles

[–] 1 pt

Bans were rare in the old v/theredpill. I think doxxing and outright spamming were the only things that warranted a ban generally.

We DID have a user flair tagging system however. Users can earn a positive flair through Challenges, or a negative flair by not "getting it" and being annoying. Is that possible here?

[–] 2 pts

https://poal.co/s/Christianity/214129

Would this post be allowed?

[–] 2 pts

I handle the v/Christfollowers (voat) sub on voat. Log in, check out the removed subs, removed comments, and banned users to get a better idea of what to expect with /s/Christianity.