WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

556

Gates is the largest owner of farmland.

He wants you to stop eating red meat.

The Gates foundation manipulates ticks.

Now there are ticks that make people allergic to red meat.

Just more coincidences.

Gates is the largest owner of farmland. He wants you to stop eating red meat. The Gates foundation manipulates ticks. Now there are ticks that make people allergic to red meat. Just more coincidences.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

So.. in an attempt to interfere with these proceedings, Keith Rainiere hired CIA cut outs to dig up dirt on the judges. He was also having them dig up dirt on Chuck Schumer and his cult was much larger than the news lead anyone to believe. Gillibrand. Schneiderman. Many more.

The NXIVM "car service" is still in operation.

Good find.

In 1995, Raniere assigned all rights in the five patents to GTI. Raniere is not listed on GTI’s incorporation documents as an officer, director, or shareholder. GTI dissolved in 1996. In 2014, Raniere executed a document on behalf of GTI, as its “sole owner,” purportedly transferring the patents to himself. Raniere subsequently sued Microsoft and AT&T for infringement, identifying himself as the patents’ owner. Microsoft moved to dismiss for lack of standing, noting that the PTO’s records indicated that Raniere did not own the patents. Raniere produced documents that, according to the court, failed to indicate that Raniere had an ownership interest in GTI at any time or had the right to assign the patents. Raniere obtained documents from an attorney, showing the GTI shareholders’ consent to a transfer of shares from Raniere’s ex-girlfriend (75% owner of GTI) to Raniere. The documents did not indicate that any transfer was completed and did not establish that Raniere owned the patents. The district court held a hearing, found that Raniere’s testimony contradicted Raniere’s earlier representation that the shares had already been transferred and was “wholly incredible and untruthful,” concluded that Raniere was unlikely to be able to cure the standing defect, dismissed the case, and found that Raniere’s conduct demonstrated “a clear history of delay and contumacious conduct.” The Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal and a subsequent award of prevailing parties attorney fees and costs, 35 U.S.C. 285.