no
there is a line between porn and art. It's not vague like people think. chissled marble depicting the form of a woman, is not porn. double teaming the little white chick is porn.
good questions
I always used the definitions: Nudity is not porn. Actively engaged genitalia is.
Seems to fit 100% of the time that I have experienced, so I feel it's a good clear definition.
I think there's more to it. How about an image depicting sexualized nudity? It does not necessarily have to directly involve genetalia.
If it sexualized, the genitalia are engaged, aren't they?
Do you think words are porn too?
Not in and of itself. When words are used like in 50 shades of gay, or Dennis Reynolds, and Erotic Life, then I suppose it is porn. It evokes the same imagery in the mind. The medium by which this is achieved is not relevant.
pic8 only deals with images though, so it is a moot point with respect to pic8
So porn just needs to be something that evokes the mind into thinking those thoughts?
That's an interesting, but not inaccurate, definition.
(post is archived)