Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.0K

Porn is parasitic. Almost all of it involves the exploitation of those sexually abused in adolescence.

People like @aou have suggested it to me in the past. Hadn't implemented because it is extra time and effort to keep up with, and I was clinging to "muh free speech". After thought, I realize there is no justification for aiding in the promulgation of degenerate sexual exploitation of the weak and abused.

Argue the point all you want. It will change nothing.

Peace faggots

Porn is parasitic. Almost all of it involves the exploitation of those sexually abused in adolescence. People like @aou have suggested it to me in the past. Hadn't implemented because it is extra time and effort to keep up with, and I was clinging to "muh free speech". After thought, I realize there is no justification for aiding in the promulgation of degenerate sexual exploitation of the weak and abused. Argue the point all you want. It will change nothing. Peace faggots

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (90).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I always used the definitions: Nudity is not porn. Actively engaged genitalia is.

Seems to fit 100% of the time that I have experienced, so I feel it's a good clear definition.

[–] • 0 pt

I think there's more to it. How about an image depicting sexualized nudity? It does not necessarily have to directly involve genetalia.

[–] • 0 pt

If it sexualized, the genitalia are engaged, aren't they?

[–] • 1 pt

Not necessarily. How about a sexually suggestive pose with genitals untouched and not visible?