WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

Minimum specs.

CPU: Pentium II or Duron
CPU SPEED: 300 MHz
RAM: 64 MB
OS: Windows 95/98
VIDEO CARD: GeForce2 or Radeon 7500
SOUND CARD: Yes
FREE DISK SPACE: 150 MB
DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 16 MB

What I got.

CPU: Pentium II 
CPU SPEED: 350 MHz
RAM: 384 MB
OS: Windows 95/98
VIDEO CARD: Voodoo3 3000 agp overclocked to 194mhz from 150
SOUND CARD: ISA SB16
FREE DISK SPACE: 20 GB or so.
DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 16 MB

I think I am going to need to throw a P3 800 in there and a newer video card.

Minimum specs. CPU: Pentium II or Duron CPU SPEED: 300 MHz RAM: 64 MB OS: Windows 95/98 VIDEO CARD: GeForce2 or Radeon 7500 SOUND CARD: Yes FREE DISK SPACE: 150 MB DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 16 MB What I got. CPU: Pentium II CPU SPEED: 350 MHz RAM: 384 MB OS: Windows 95/98 VIDEO CARD: Voodoo3 3000 agp overclocked to 194mhz from 150 SOUND CARD: ISA SB16 FREE DISK SPACE: 20 GB or so. DEDICATED VIDEO RAM: 16 MB I think I am going to need to throw a P3 800 in there and a newer video card.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Windows 3.11 was good.

[–] 1 pt

Now with 100 percent more workgroups!

[–] 0 pt

Meaning ... 3.11 was the only good one .... 95 was passable ... but they fucked that up

[–] 0 pt

The only reason I have a 98 box is the games I missed, everything after 3.11 was trash. Ditching having windows ride on top of dos was not a good move, I loved that if you had program glitch out and take out windows you would just be back at a dos shell and fire it back up. XP was good as well.