WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

291

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I think he is playing the intent angle and implying that the dead cinematographer was collateral and not the intended target. Killing a few people makes an assassination look less like an assassination.

Personally I think negligence will probably be the better explanation, libshit cali cucks don't have any firearm discipline. Diversity hire firearms guy left a live round in the chamber or something. I'm having trouble buying the 'debris' theory, I can't see a fatality from a pebble unless it was point blank.

[–] 1 pt

Hollywood guns are usually rigged so they cannot fire solids down the barrel

[–] 0 pt

How is that done? Is that the kind of thing where some shitty welds can come loose and get flung down field?

[–] 1 pt

Yes. Though usually it is done by a gunsmith, Hollywood is full of cheap jews and it is possible they cheaped out on the welding.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

I just wouldn't be surprised if it wasn't an accident. Lives are cheap to them. Hard for me to believe the prop gun killed someone without tampering too.

Edit: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2021-10-22/alec-baldwin-rust-camera-crew-walked-off-set?_amp=true HAHAHA

Get's even better https://pic8.co/sh/di7RbB.jpg

Apparently someone just randomly handed him a loaded gun and he just HAPPENED to play around with it by shooting at the woman.