> Nothing wrong with peer review. I notice you have a Jew tag for whatever reason. > It's healthy to hold the burden of proof on those making the scientific claims. One's claims are proven by their predictions, not peer review. > The problem, today, is when you can't find a half dozen scientists who are experts in the field and aren't overtly biased Everyone is biased, that is WHY science is based on measurable PREDICTIONS. NOT peer review. Peer review is literally just for checking spelling, obvious mistakes and such.