>What you're thing about within your brain are "word" based definitions of reality; which implies you already consented to believe (have faith) in those who offered you the words that define your reality. Now you're getting to filling in blanks and incorrectly like a bad ad-lib. When you tell people what things are, are you not defining them and thus negating flow? When you refer to things as an appearance, then isn't that more accurate within the concept of flow? Water can adapt to any form, you put water into a cup it becomes the cup, you rotate the cup but the water is still, but flowing and adapting to the shape. That is a good map. Water nourishes all without prejudice, and seeks the lowest place possible.