Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

The idea is to get rid of single property landlords so banks can be the "landlord". This list will not change at all. All jews are bad.

The idea is to get rid of single property landlords so banks can be the "landlord". This list will not change at all. All jews are bad.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (13).
[–] • 0 pt

I don't think you understand the thread. Landlords are good, usury is jewish and bad.

[–] • 0 pt

Yes it's good that young White couples should have to pay 1400$ a month to borrow a one bedroom apartment so they can't afford a house or kids until they're 45 and can't have kids. You truly are a defender of the race, man. No wait, tribe. That's the word I was looking for. (((Tribe))).

[–] • 0 pt

Holy... You are stupid. There's a difference between that and what I've explained ITT. Yet here you are being dishonest. Also

Can't afford a house but can afford more than $1400 / month to lease.

The problem isn't landlords specifically. It's jewish laws and allowances for nonWhites. But as I've already pointed out, you're intellectually lagging and being dishonest.

[–] • 0 pt

How have you explained anything? Yes the banks are bad, that doesn't make landlords good. They are two heads on the same beast.

Can't afford a house but can afford more than $1400 / month to lease.

They can't afford it. Many working people (not the trust fund kiddies who become landlords) are spending well over half their income on rent because the alternative is homelessness. Apparently buying an extra house twenty years ago entitles you to own slaves. Who knew?

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not defending (((corporations))) and (((banks))). If they're the wolves then landlords are the crows picking at the carcass.

Those aren't landlords, they own properties sure but they source everything out to other jewish corps. to do the managing of the property - if it can even be called that. Again: that's not being a landlord.

So you define landlord as just the good ones? That's circular but ok, good landlords are good. But most "people who own rental properties but aren't landlords because reasons" do exactly what those corporations do on a smaller scale. A few of them buy up every available property in town and start charging 1000+ a month in rent, mysteriously never undercutting each other in price. Maybe you live in a big city and don't see the small time land barons doing this.

Part of the problem is inflation, banks and stupid regulations pushing house prices to ridiculous heights but "people who own rental properties but aren't landlords because reasons" are also driving up the prices. Probably deliberately.

They're a part of maturing into adulthood

I'll resist the urge to "ok boomer" you but this definitely implies you're old. It was probably true once but now most Americans under 50 rent or live with their parents, meaning landlords aren't just a part of growing up but a near life long burden on their shoulders.

But I guess that's fine, White people should just wait until they're 50 and sterile to start a family. They can just adopt Haitians right?

I'm not arguing or discussing this point with (((you))) as you pilpul about, lie, and intentionally conflate, forget and misconstrue ideas to attack something positive.

I learned it by watching you!