Oh, I'm talking to StupidBird. K that post you linked had nothing to do with the link and everything to do with the use of "joo" and you know that. >It's also been stickied for years. Is just a statement, yup it's a thing that affirms your submission. The point of contention was the use of the jew-forced subversion of "joo", that's it. That was went on and explained down the comment chain. And sure, I went a too hard in that comment. Fully agree, however the use of "joo" is still a point of jewish subversion. That you're still salty about that is astonishing. But whatever, keep on.