WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

483

This isn't about me. I had no part in (((chemo))). I do have a red-pilled info collection on it. I think I got it off of here.

This isn't about me. I had no part in (((chemo))). I do have a red-pilled info collection on it. I think I got it off of here.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

There was a study in 2004 (based on data from the USA and Australia) that showed that not even 3% of people treated with chemo where still alive after 5 years; not necessarily cured, just alive. Also, for certain type of cancer, the percentage of survivor was 0%.

If anybody has info on a more recent study, please share.

Archived: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15630849/ (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Archived: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Victor-Christianto/post/Why-is-the-success-rate-of-chemotherapy-very-low-And-is-it-possible-to-improve-that/attachment/59d622726cda7b8083a1c280/AS:273544838090760@1442229580168/download/contribution-of-chemotherapy-morgan.pdf (researchgate.net)

[–] 1 pt

Much easier to control people when they're perpetually ill. And how convenient when they pay to be kept ill.

[–] 0 pt

Theyll just argue that another million would die of cancer and not chemo. How could we prove that wrong?

[–] 0 pt

Oh shit, is this true, brother?