Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K
https://poal.co/s/Anything/254048 = https://archive.md/1senR This is disgusting.

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts (edited )

Yeah. I'm all for free speech, but pedos need to burn.

[–] • 6 pts

Porn at all isn't protected by the first amendment.

You should hear about the (((SCOUTS))) case that "decided" that it was.

Some kike lawyer presented some pornography to some prurient Whites.

The kike lawyer asked them "are you aroused by this?"

They said no.

The kike the claimed that because they weren't aroused, they weren't prurient and the porn was then protected speech because it didn't arouse prurients. Or something akin to that. I lost the archive of the case.

[–] • 4 pts

jews doing jew things

[–] • 0 pt

Precisely.

I hope someone who knows the specifics wanders in here and can post it.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

so because healthy people are not aroused by pornography and probably find it disgusting and morally objectionable, it is "protected speech?

"when did you quit beating your wife?"

[–] • 1 pt

We can have moral standards, those have not been outlawed as far as I know. Any description of child sexualization whether it be prose, or photographic is considered a violation of the law.