WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K
[–] 1 pt 14d (edited 14d)

I don't know about you, but that doesn't seem very "green" to me. The energy conversion losses must be extraordinary: extracting crude, refining the crude, distributing the diesel, burning the diesel and converting mechanical motion to electrical energy, later converting it to chemical energy. Then converting chemical energy to electrical energy. Finally, converting electrical energy back to mechanical motion.

Not to mention all the particulate pollution the generator emits. Ouch!

Maybe skipping the entire electrical generation part and simply driving the wheels of a truck would be greener.

the electric vans are part of its "urgent" climate change initiative to "remove carbon emissions from transportation systems."

Bahahahaha!!!!

[–] 1 pt 14d

Electricity is green energy! No pollutants! Please bro, why can't you see this?

[–] 1 pt 14d

It must be my antisemitism kicking in.

[–] 1 pt 14d

:laughs in nuclear:

[–] 0 pt 14d

Got to charge them somehow. I’m sure we will see this reported very soon by the MSM

[–] 0 pt 14d

Yeah, but they get to feel so much better about themselves for using electric vans. That's what is important...

[–] 0 pt 14d

Worth. Those diesel engine generators pay for themselves. They get this cool sticker that says "they are pioneering electric truck deliveries" and it allows them to collect subsidies for "going green"

Advanced jew-jitsu of money changing hands.