We don't owe them shit.
We don't owe them shit.
Just when you think things couldn't get any weirder something like this pops up out of left field.
Wow.
Just when you think things couldn't get any weirder something like this pops up out of left field.
Wow.
How in the hell would this even work? Anyone could claim they couldn't file as a gay couple.
The way things are going, on election comes the DNC will be straight up handing out twenty bucks to everyone in line to vote Dem.
How in the hell would this even work? Anyone could claim they couldn't file as a gay couple.
The way things are going, on election comes the DNC will be straight up handing out twenty bucks to everyone in line to vote Dem.
Don't gay men on average have higher incomes than straight men? That's just giving an economically privileged group more privilege.
Don't gay men on average have higher incomes than straight men? That's just giving an economically privileged group more privilege.
They have more money because of 2 incomes and no children. I wouldn't trade my life for theirs for any amount of money.
They have more money because of 2 incomes and no children. I wouldn't trade my life for theirs for any amount of money.
They also have more higher education on average. A clear mark of privilege.
They also have more higher education on average. A clear mark of privilege.
I don't owe shit to sexual deviants.
I don't owe shit to sexual deviants.
Early political theorists thought that America went against the prior assumptions about democracy. Prior democracy was something that was written about in books and talked about in theory. The consensus of why it wouldn't work is because it would break down in to mobs just voting to steal wealth for themselves. When the US didn't immediately turn into an obvious wealth transfer system political theory had to be rethought.
Well, maybe the older thoughts were correct. Yeah, let's just have overt wealth transfer to specific voting blocks. Literally through out 250+ years of standards completely. Democracy now has no shred of ethics.
Early political theorists thought that America went against the prior assumptions about democracy. Prior democracy was something that was written about in books and talked about in theory. The consensus of why it wouldn't work is because it would break down in to mobs just voting to steal wealth for themselves. When the US didn't immediately turn into an obvious wealth transfer system political theory had to be rethought.
Well, maybe the older thoughts were correct. Yeah, let's just have overt wealth transfer to specific voting blocks. Literally through out 250+ years of standards completely. Democracy now has no shred of ethics.
(post is archived)