![Clott Adams [1414x1158 - 764KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/K1ZRUs.jpg){kind=link}
Oh, he knows. He hasn't taken the vaccine, despite what he claims.
How else do you explain that someone his age is still alive despite having exposed themselves to a genetically engineered weapon?
I agree with the No Agenda (podcast) guys .. this thing probably kills 1%~3% (same as CoV2) .. millions have taken it and have not died and have survivors bias. A lot of them are in denial about being sick/vaccine injured too.
Yeah, agreed. Although, it seems to cause so many different ailments, many of which might be more like ticking time bombs (ie cancer 5 years down the road).
So you’ve got people who keel over within days, weeks, or months of taking the shot.. that is probably your 1-3%.
If it attacks the immune system as many say it does, then this would naturally produce a variety of ailments..much like AIDS, so the comparison is apt in that regard.
Remember, AIDS isn’t what kills someone..rather, they die from something that would otherwise be innocuous because AIDS destroys the body’s ability to defend itself.
The same thing could be happening with this, which makes it that much easier to hide the real cause.
It kills that many immediately or within a short time span. Over a 10 or 15 year span the mortality rate is going to be vastly higher.
Think about all the people who didn't die but have crippling health issues now, and that's only a fraction of how many actually have those health issues and don't know it.
The people who can't work because of their advanced severe myocarditis are not going to be around in 15 years.
He's only 65.
What kind of weapon can't kill a 65 year old?
A mutagenic one that has wildly different prognoses depending on how the poison gene therapy interacted with their immune system and which batch they got.
I have older relatives, as in 70s and 80s who were scared into taking it. Many are still alive. It isn’t like you get the clot shot and keel over. It’s possible they’re sedentary enough that they haven’t triggered an event yet.
Damn. What if that’s the point?
The jabs were intended to prevent an uprising of athletic younger people?
In my country, gyms required you to be vaccinated to enter for almost 2 years. I haven't heard of any gym complaining that all their customers drop dead on the treadmill or while lifting weights.
I also doubt that being old and sedentary is good for your heart.
Chance of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by age, 2014: https://files.catbox.moe/ffg60n.jpg
Not exactly what I meant. I'm not advocating for sedentary living. Being active and unjabbed is better than sedentary and jabbed, but sedentary and jabbed might be better than active and jabbed, at least in terms of length of life.
I'm wondering if the purpose is to weaken the heart to where if you're really in an adrenaline-rich, heart pumping situation such as competitive athletics (or combat), you would drop dead. Or perhaps even if it's because they are next-level performers, that there might be something the jabs are attacking. It also might be something that causes wear over time as you amp up your heart rate, and those athletes with more susceptible hearts were the ones who were "canaries in the coal mine" who have already died as a result.
(post is archived)