I’ve followed a large swath of libertarian economists for decades, and none of them hold this position. It’s illogical.
I'm not a libertarian, but it should instead be "until we end the welfare state, we can't have open borders". They would see open borders as desirable, but that immigration would self limit based on property values and freedom of association. This is assuming we're talking about a Ron Paul / Mises / Hayek etc. style right libertarian, not a "libertarian socialist" type which just wants the government to support their drug binges.
That’s my list of economists and thinkers. Yes.
I’ve taken my own view a step further, arguing that, once the “welfare state” has ended, “open borders” only function as far as visitation, not citizenship, because I firmly believe in ethnostates, and see mixing of cultures and races as detrimental.
I consider myself a libertarian and don’t agree with open borders at all. That conflicts heavily with the concept of property rights. This all reeks of long nose tribe.
Libertarians believe in pedophilia. It’s the dumbest and most evil ideology you can hold.
Fuck off with your bullshit. Pedophilia violates the most basic civil liberties of another person. No one has any libertarian basis to say otherwise. Stop projecting your gay shit.
(post is archived)