Complex issue. But honestly it points to the weakness of men. Women refused suffrage. It was forced upon them by men.
Temperance movement-> prohibition-> suffrage-> women's lib -> feminism... except for temperance, it was all Jews who pushed and manipulated the rest.
Women are weak minded and easily controlled by emotions. They know only how to nurture children and destroy civilization. This is, after all, one of the very first lessons taught in the bible. Women are easily manipulated to do that which destroys and men pay the cost (says we lost immortality because of Eve's sin).
Women are a tool of evil when not sheltered and guided by men. This is why christianity requires women to submit to their fathers, brothers, and husbands, and prevents them from leadership. It's not cruel to do so. It's an imperative to protect all humanity. This is why christianity is patriarchal. This is why communism and judaism is matriarchal. One is Godly. The other is Satanic.
I mean, after a seeing this clip, I'm going to have to go ahead and disagree with you on your statement: "[Women] know only how to nurture children and destroy civilization."
Apparently some don't even know how to nurture children.
These are generalizations after all.
Women act woefully retarded after men give them what they scream and beg for
"yeah it's the men's fault"
Cool thanks. So they're just ultimately helpless retarded sheep that need to be constantly herded?
it used to be society would self police women from being complete fucking whores by forcing women to be boudn to the family, and there were TONS of protections to stop women from succumbing to their own shitty behaviors. For example, women int he 1950s could NOT take out loans or get a bank account without the permission of the husband. Not because they weren't capable of doing so, but because men back then knew it was a fucking terrible idea to give women access to cash. Look at women now, 75% of all student loan holders, trillions in welfare debt, baby mama payments, etc
Good addition. Ty.
No. They need to be submissive to men. Men need to be strong leaders of women. As has been the case for all recorded history of successful civilization.
Only the indoctrinated believe otherwise. There certainly is no recent discovery which invalidates the historical norm. In fact, recent history only further affirms it.
To be clear, did women give themselves suffrage? Or did men? Did men allow women out of the kitchen or did men allow them to enter the workforce?
Like it or not, but men and women have both been destroying civilization. And it started with weak men facilitating the natural proclivities of women. Women now do what comes natural to them - destroying children and civilization with men (and civilization) paying for it all.
yes, indeed
lots of apologism there.
Only if you squint with a long nose. Noticed you didn't actually say anything. What you actually said isn't true.
Guess we're not supposed to notice...
Your first couple of sentences did kinda piss me off calling men weak, but by the end i understood 100% your point, and you sir are correct.
points to the weakness of men
go fuck yourself jew
i said quite clearly and plainly - A LOT OF APOLOGISM THERE
which is spot on and about as descriptive as i need to be.
there will be no pilpul victories for you here schlomo
muh apologisms
Is it incorrect though?
and a lot of faggotry in your reply.
(post is archived)