![California OFFICIALLY declares War on the White Race [600x562 - 89KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/pR6SMI.png){kind=link}
I guess only time will tell?
As always.
I think yes this is partly a cultural/ideological war but it's also a bloody racial war.
Race and ideology are more closely related than you may think.
Too many White folks though are not aware that it is indeed racial.
They will learn.
Sadly, many will suffer more and will have to feel more pain and discomfort before they figure it out.
Indeed, but this only garners our camp more support. The thing about our conflict is that there is a critical point where we must strike. Now is not the time. Look at the hostile's news every now and then. Just recently they were lamenting the fact that, after the summer riots of BLM, Whites expressed only 27% support, creating an overall large drop in a few months.
The worse things get, interestingly enough, the easier it gets for us in terms of gathering our strength. Look at the Q folks and how dedicated they are. Years ago, many of those followers would never have thought of anything like it or expressed any interest.
We are the vanguard, the first. The leaders and officers. When people begin asking questions, we must be there to show them the answer. Not tell them, show them.
And if society continues its current path, all we have to do is point a finger. Then we will have another among us.
I can see that. The more desperate and bad things get we will be more open minded to listen to people and solutions that we never could imagine us thinking of much less supporting. Now is not the time for action. The way I see it is we need to migrate to the northwest to organize and then break up from the U.S. Obviously the jewish system will not allow a peaceful breakup and that will be THE TIME.
The more desperate and bad things get we will be more open minded to listen to people and solutions that we never could imagine us thinking of much less supporting.
Precisely. I can make any man on this rock call for the eradication of any group, given proper time and resources. What matters though is if the cause is just and true. If it is not, then there will inevitably be issues that may not be solved.
Manipulation itself is not necessarily a bad thing. It is how it is used. I believe Goebbels understood this, which is why his propaganda was so effective. It was the truth packaged in a manner that would both inform and rally the masses. After all, he did say propaganda need not lie.
For those that may be considered the manipulated... If the cause is righteous, they will not care. If it is not righteous, then they will turn from the most loyal to the most hostile in a heartbeat.
So, always stand by the truth. If you find you cannot do so, then offer a lie that will result in the truth being uncovered and allow the curious mind to grow and become stronger for it. They may resent you initially, but if you sit them down and outline exactly what you did to help them understand, then they will understand.
It's like teaching a child that some things ought not to be meddled with. Sometimes you have to let them scrape their knees a bit.
The way I see it is we need to migrate to the northwest to organize and then break up from the U.S.
A concentrated force is one easily defeated by a superior enemy. There will be a time for that, but initially it is best if we are spread around. If things kick off, all 50 states will become hotzones. Do you recall the 4chan post from the red team planner? Even if it was a larp, it was a correct one. We win the second we stand.
But we must choose that moment carefully.
The mass media will always be a propaganda channel it's simply what direction the propaganda is going. No I actually never heard of the 4chan post you are mentioning. I simply see that we are outnumbered in many areas and it would be sensible to go to the northwest to carve out that White homeland, fight and work from there. We need a strong team. We are scattered and needless to say it hasn't helped us hence the 50+ years of failure in this movement.
Race and ideology are more closely related than you may think.
They've done enough studies to show a significant correlation between political ideology and genetics, just one example.
There are definite genetic subdivisions in europeans determining our political divides, and I'm not just talking about shapeshifters.
I wonder if theres any specific studies on how facial features in whites correlate with politics.
The worse things get, interestingly enough, the easier it gets for us in terms of gathering our strength. Look at the Q folks and how dedicated they are. Years ago, many of those followers would never have thought of anything like it or expressed any interest. We are the vanguard, the first. The leaders and officers. When people begin asking questions, we must be there to show them the answer. Not tell them, show them.
God bless ya Phantom, hope is a dangerous thing.
They've done enough studies to show a significant correlation between political ideology and genetics, just one example.
Mmhmm, I've heard of those.
There are definite genetic subdivisions in europeans determining our political divides, and I'm not just talking about shapeshifters.
Of course. Take the Germanics, Anglos, and Mediterranean peoples. All European, but different ways of life. Architecture, art, etc... It's just how we are. You can really see it in wartime with vehicle designs, particularly in WWII. German panzers look so typically German. Highly engineered, continually modified, and very utilitarian while also advanced enough to be seen as cutting edge. English vehicles are, funny enough, quite "royal" in their designs. Take the Spitfire compared to the 109. The Spit was designed with functionality and elegance, whereas the 109 from Germany was raw performance.
American designs are like a happy medium between the two, which makes perfect sense for the time because we had heavy Germanic and Anglo influence in our blood and general culture. It was quality engineering, but also created with a kind of "flare" to it that just looks American. The Sherman and P-51 being the shining examples of this. The P-51 was like a mashup of the 109 and Spit, while the Sherman was an "American panzer that is good but able to be mass produced" rather than continually upgraded (though, of course, the Shermans acquired various upgrades due to the nature of the conflict).
I wonder if theres any specific studies on how facial features in whites correlate with politics.
Chad Aryan Jawline: Super Straight SS
Anglo face: Eh feck off moi nayvee is bettah. Rool Britannia.
American face: Stares in blind patriotism
Russian face: Ve work, ve die. Have drink and shoot guns to fill gaps.
God bless ya Phantom, hope is a dangerous thing.
No, God with all of you. I haven't earned any blessings in my opinion. I never will.
And hope is a dangerous thing. That's why it we ought to weaponize it.
I dont see why they don't use tanks as a platform for mobile artillery, or even tanks that can launch drones.
It seems like there would be some value in something that moves on the ground, heavily armored and not picked up by radar (flying low as it were), and can roll right up to enemy lines before launching planes/bombers, or artillery shells behind enemy lines disrupting logistics and retreat. Sort of like how the japanese launched planes using subs as platforms.
Also while gas weapons are banned by geneva convention, I see no reason artillery doesn't do zone denial and cut off retreats, using flammable shells. Tanks and soldiers can avoid ordinary ordinance, because its an event with a short and fixed interval in space and time, while fire keeps on burning as long as it has fuel. They'll cross a crater to move forward or retreat.
Thats harder to do when its three hundred feet of napalm you have to cross. Probably roast vehicles and tank crews too, or at least choke em out.
(post is archived)