though only if a better selection of clip-fed rifles were available
Crux of your argument is compromised by your own admission^
Based on that assertion as a premise, it’s a semantic argument regarding clip cost and feeding reliability.
I’d err on the side of the superior platform, in my and military procurement professionals’ opinion, but if you shoot straight and stay alive, I’d be the first to say — fuck my opinion
You're right, I'd want an M4gery and a 9mm too. I'm arguing for the "idea" of clip fed rifles, not their current relevancy, as the SKS & Garand are the only two example I even know of.
I actually think one reason such rifles aren't developed is because they'd be too effective for civilian use vs. box magazines, particularly a high(ish) capacity Garand-style-clip fed design.
Box magazines mean the user's maximum downrange output is pre-determined by pre-loaded magazines, or having the means to reload amidst shooting. By definition, cips are both pre-loaded and always lighter than box magazines.
A box full of loaded clips is just how they're sold, while finding a dozen loaded 30 round box magazines could be a DA's wet dream. There are so many reasons I'm right, except the actual modern guns to prove it.
Just wait 'til I post my take on revolvers.
(post is archived)