Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

190

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

But I thought Elon said satellite connectivity is disabled when orbiting over countries where Starlink is banned.

Unless China was able to get some Starlink kits and was able to connect?

[–] • 2 pts

>In January 2007, China tested its first successful anti-satellite missile (ASAT), destroying one of its own inactive weather satellites and creating one of the world's largest space debris incidents. That space debris is still floating around in space, causing collision risks every day.

lol

[–] • 0 pt

He lies?

[–] • 1 pt

No one can be sure, unless they release a statement with evidences.

On the other hand that would be stupid knowing Tesla has a big market there.

[–] • 0 pt

Space is becoming crowded and risks of collision -- whether with satellites or space debris -- are not new.

I am so tired of hearing this bullshit repeated as if everyone is so stupid they can't see through the blatant bullshit. Space is anything but crowded. There is far more space in orbit than all the space in all the oceans of the world. It is hard to get anything up there and nearly impossible to keep it up there. Space debris is not a real threat to anything. Micro meteorites are far more of a threat.

This is 100% about china's control of the internet. They don't want any holes in their dragnet. Everyone always spouts the bullshit about VPNs but the reality is they control those too and use them to spy on the people who think they are cheating the system.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Because you went to space or are working in a field even remotely related to it?

https://youtu.be/w_PWL0oZzOc?t=38

[–] • 0 pt

I'm familiar with the propaganda you posted. Do you understand that what they did there is take every tiny thing they could find and portrayed it as the size of a small city? Do you understand how manipulative and unrealistic that is?

If there is only 1 object and you blow its size up to be bigger that earth suddenly it looks pretty crowded up there.

Compare the size of one of those dots to a city on that planet. How many millions of times bigger did they have to make the problem to scare you? Why are you so easily manipulated?

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

The "propaganda" I posted features an astronaut among other space professionals, an astronaut who got confronted with the problem obviously

So, again what are your credentials? On what elements do you base your "expertise", other than arbitrary conjectures? Is there any credible source supporting your claim at least, no? https://search.brave.com/search?q=space+debris+hoax&source=desktop I ask because you seem to be the only one making that claim, and also because a nobody telling me nuclear bomb don't exist, based on nothing but his fantasies, isn't going to be very convincing...

So?

https://airandspace.si.edu/explore-and-learn/multimedia/detail.cfm?id=6572

https://pic8.co/sh/OOIUEg.jpeg

This image shows the radiator section (rear end) of the Wide Field Planetary Camera II (WFPC2), installed on the Hubble Space Telescope. During the various Hubble servicing missions, astronauts noticed tiny dimples and dents in the radiator – the result of space debris. After more than15 years of exposure to space, this surface became a record of the accumulation of such debris in low Earth orbit. Naturally, NASA wanted to evaluate the amount and nature of this debris, and so after the camera was returned to Earth the impact sites were analyzed. The largest core samples left holes about 30 mm in diameter, but the debris particles were less than a mm in size. The analysis is ongoing.

https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/4858/why-havent-more-spacecraft-satellites-been-hit-by-debris

[–] • 0 pt

Getting vibes of Howard Hughes and the Glomar Explorer

[–] • 0 pt

If Putin really wanted to disable Ukraine's internet, he could have done so on day one. See also 'power, water, radio, TV, mail service, food distribution etc etc'.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Of course "he" tried to disable ukraine's telecommunication means, that's warfare 101. You aren't just going to let the enemy run his propaganda and benefit from satellite imageries, GPS, and various other telecommunication means if you can shut them down. "He" certainly succeeded to some extent, but not entirely. I use quotes because well, it's not putin doing it himself with a clamp

[–] • 0 pt

Musk should hire a private army, invade China.