honey pot run by the FBI. Really more than half the members are under cover.
How did you come to that conclusion?
Maybe personal knowledge how the feds track white dangerous people who resist the government. I hate to debate because you can have a mountain of evidence and still lose, you can never change a persons point of view.
Bottom line: that message is useless coming from a white power org but would be good for jews to claim antisemitism. You are making me go down a rat hole here...anyway thanks for giving me a hard time.
The website isn't really important in that case, since the message is legit.
People should vote against that jewed bill to protect their 1A.
Agree message on point! Same page.
It is important, and this flyer is not good. It will appeal to the counter-culture that's already aware of jewish subversion, but is kryptonite for normies. They shouldn't put fucking skulls in their flyers and use a URL with "white power" in it (there's no way in hell I'm clicking that link, but Joe Sixpack will check it out on their phone walking down the street?).
It should a mainstream sounding URL and be framed as an attack on freedom of speech and a "slippery slope". It should use the "one race the human race" narrative against the jews, and call out how the proposed law is not applied to ethnic groups equally, which is "Un-American". Apple pie, BBQ, and baseball shit. Make it embarrassing for jews to support. This would literally get jews in Florida to oppose the nonsense bill and cause division with those backing it. This is how successful mainstream political ads are done at this stage, because it works. You want to galvanize your base if it's big, but in this case it's absolutely not big. Therefore you want to appeal to the masses and divide your enemy's support. You can use more aggressive, edgy tactics when you have a substantial base, but not at this stage.
The jews that subverted the West did it over generations, bit by bit. I don't think we have to wait generations to stop the degeneracy, but it has to be strategic, pragmatic, and incremental in its approach, or it will fail.
I would be far more impressed if they were raising money to fight it in court like Defense Distributed just did with the ATF (and won). Even with kiked out courts, there's no fucking way this bill is remotely constitutional. That might change my opinion. They need to be far, far more cunning and strategic in how they fight. This is some ham handed bullshit right here. It will do nothing at best, and potentially backfire. We'll see if I'm right.
(post is archived)