Once anyone agrees you can limit speech for any reason, you no longer have freedom, you get tyranny. The tyranny will simply increase until there is no speech.
This is true for anything: exceptions always invite more exceptions.
Crime. Once you decide certain crimes are no longer crimes, you get more crime until crimes no longer exist.
Taxes. Once you start taxing one thing, slowly, everything gets taxed.
Safety. Once you allow authority to limit you for any safety concerns, tyranny will explode as it redefines everything as a safety problem.
Your argument can also be used against free speech: Once some expressions of profanity/degeneracy are allowed and protected as 'free speech', a deluge of such speech is sure to follow—lowering the average quality of discourse and culture for all.
I invite you to recognize that 'freedom' isn't some ideal and attainable state in and of itself, but rather describes a system of trade-offs. To be more free in some ways is always to be less free in others. I understand that it's emotionally compelling to speak of these things as platitudes and absolutes, but in reality the particulars matter. Wise governance and personal choice are both important; what we need to do is find a sweet spot between the two and protect each from their own worst tendencies.
(post is archived)