Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

923

Just notice.

e; Notice (((Imnobody))) first subverting the thread by making it as though it's not some tranny kike and the issue is the women in this photo. Then (((he))) follows it up with degeneracy about muh women are miserable and sexless with their "vaginas clamped shut".

https://archive.md/pZJzF

Just notice. e; Notice (((Imnobody))) first subverting the thread by making it as though it's not some tranny kike and the issue is the women in this photo. Then (((he))) follows it up with degeneracy about muh women are miserable and sexless with their "vaginas clamped shut". https://archive.md/pZJzF

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 1 pt

That in addition to what is between the legs.

[–] • 0 pt

Ok. Maybe I’m anatomically different, and this is the first I’ve heard of it...all my parts sit in the front. I am not trolling for an argument. I do agree it’s a power stance. And when girls in there 20s walk around pigeon toed, they are trying to look like a child who is ultimately trying to catch the eye of an older man. They want the approval and love daddy never gave them.

[–] • 2 pts

It has nothing to do with the kikery in (((your))) reply. It's due to the testicle + penis and the anatomical shape of the pelvis. It's not "muh ebin sexist power stance".

Fuck off.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm really getting annoyed with agreeing with you. Stop that.

[–] • 0 pt

Ha. Ha. That was quick. You’re a child.