Seems odd that there would be a single owner of an infrastructure piece that probably had elusive rights to travel along multiple states probably using state powers of land condemnation.
That in itself seems like a suspicious situation.
Wonder if he also got an exclusive lease on the world trade center and got a big payout.
Seems odd that there would be a single owner of an infrastructure piece that probably had elusive rights to travel along multiple states probably using state powers of land condemnation.
That in itself seems like a suspicious situation.
Wonder if he also got an exclusive lease on the world trade center and got a big payout.
Kind of yes, kind of no. TransCanada is a big company that specializes in this sort of thing. It wasn't being built as a public infrastructure project, it was private - which was why it's initial cost was quite high.
Kind of yes, kind of no. TransCanada is a big company that specializes in this sort of thing. It wasn't being built as a public infrastructure project, it was private - which was why it's initial cost was quite high.
(post is archived)