WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Trying to go the way of the EU and Canada, telling the truth is “hate”. The truth doesn’t need laws, only lies do.

No similar law has been passed anywhere in America barring people from boycotting the United States.

The specific bill Abbott just endorsed is not yet clear but in January he said he's planning to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition into state law during the next legislative session.

The IHRA's definition of anti-Semitism is completely antithetical to the First Amendment.

The definition defines anti-Semitism as: - Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.

Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.

Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.

Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. No other ethnic or religious group in America is afforded any such privileges.

As we've all seen, the American people are allowed to be denigrated relentlessly and blamed for all the evils of the entire world.

*When they dare to stand up for themselves they get smeared by the media and sell-outs like Governor Abbott, banned from social media and blacklisted from the financial system!

To borrow a line the Governor himself said last week, "The United States of America was built on free speech and healthy debate, [Gov. Abbott and] Big Tech's efforts to silence American viewpoints is un-American, un-Texan and it is unacceptable!"

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62095

Trying to go the way of the EU and Canada, telling the truth is “hate”. The truth doesn’t need laws, only lies do. >No similar law has been passed anywhere in America barring people from boycotting the United States. >The specific bill Abbott just endorsed is not yet clear but in January **he said he's planning to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's working definition** into state law during the next legislative session. >The IHRA's definition of anti-Semitism is completely antithetical to the First Amendment. >**The definition defines anti-Semitism as:** - Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. >Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. >Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). >Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. >Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations. >Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. >Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. >Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis. >Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis. >Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel. No other ethnic or religious group in America is afforded any such privileges. >**As we've all seen, the American people are allowed to be denigrated relentlessly and blamed for all the evils of the entire world**. >**When they dare to stand up for themselves they get smeared by the media and sell-outs like Governor Abbott, banned from social media and blacklisted from the financial system!* To borrow a line the Governor himself said last week, "The United States of America was built on free speech and healthy debate, [Gov. Abbott and] Big Tech's efforts to silence American viewpoints is un-American, un-Texan and it is unacceptable!" http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62095

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

The jew is more afraid than it's ever been. Why else are they and their zog puppets tripping over themselves to ban, silence, and deplatform anybody and anything who speaks the truth?

[–] 1 pt

I can’t figure out if they’re afraid, overconfident or trying to destroy as much of the host as fast as possible as I stated in one of my other comment.

I can’t even figure out the plan, it’s pretty much a race to destruction and making everyone they can hate each while profiting from it.

I’ve heard countless people say the red states need to break away with Texas in charge, so we can be the red zog states of America?

I’ve always said keep it local or regional otherwise you’ll be compromised with the same jews just pretending to push a different agenda but in the end it will still lead to destruction.

There’s really only one solution and even though they’ve said it’s been tried before, it hasn’t but needs to be. Kicking them out as has happened hundreds of times in the past won’t work in modern times with the way the world is connected.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

I think it just boils down to accumulating power while they distract everyone with tranny pride and black lies matter. Right now is the late stage of a long plan that has worked out very well for them. Deranged leftists and somewhat well-meaning but incredibly gullible normies have spent the last few years begging for censorship on the internet, and those big tech companies are happy to oblige and assume more power under the guise of opposing "hate speech". Of course the other half of this plan is to actually deplatform whites and other dissidents. End result: more money, more power, more control. Give the goyim some breadcrumbs now and then to make them think everything's fine. Let a few cucks like Ted Cruz speak about social media censorship so that it looks like opposing voices exist, rather than drawing attention to the obvious truth that there is only true one party.

But despite all that the kikes still can't disarm the gun owners. That's what scares them.