'The DEFIANCE Act will allow victims to finally defend their reputations and take civil action against individuals who produced, distributed, or received digital forgeries,' she continued.
The bill would create a right for victims of 'digital forgery' to sue publishers who forge their likeness 'using software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or any other computer-generated or technological means.'
Why isn't she shouting to ban AI if it is so dangerous? Seems she is okay with AI's other abuses so long as it doesn't affect her directly.
>'The DEFIANCE Act will allow victims to finally defend their reputations and take civil action against individuals who produced, distributed, or received digital forgeries,' she continued.
>The bill would create a right for victims of 'digital forgery' to sue publishers who forge their likeness 'using software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or any other computer-generated or technological means.'
Why isn't she shouting to ban AI if it is so dangerous? Seems she is okay with AI's other abuses so long as it doesn't affect her directly.
(post is archived)