Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

598

> WAYMO ADMITS USING REMOTE OPERATORS IN THE PHILIPPINES FOR U.S. VEHICLES - TESLA SAYS “NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN ABLE TO TAKE OVER CONTROL OF OUR VEHICLES.”

During a U.S. Senate hearing, Waymo confirmed that human operators located in the Philippines can remotely intervene when its vehicles encounter problems on American roads.

That means in certain situations, a split-second driving decision isn’t being made by the car - it’s being influenced by a human thousands of miles away.

Senators openly warned about cybersecurity risks, delayed reaction times, and the implications of foreign operators interacting with vehicles moving through U.S. cities in real time.

Then Tesla testified.

Tesla stated its driving controls are physically isolated, cannot be accessed remotely, firmware updates require dual cryptographic approval, and that no hacker has ever taken control of a Tesla vehicle - despite years of paid hacking attempts.

Same hearing. Same risks. Two radically different systems.

Why does an “autonomous” car need a human in another country anywhere near the decision chain?

>> WAYMO ADMITS USING REMOTE OPERATORS IN THE PHILIPPINES FOR U.S. VEHICLES - TESLA SAYS “NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN ABLE TO TAKE OVER CONTROL OF OUR VEHICLES.” During a U.S. Senate hearing, Waymo confirmed that human operators located in the Philippines can remotely intervene when its vehicles encounter problems on American roads. That means in certain situations, a split-second driving decision isn’t being made by the car - it’s being influenced by a human thousands of miles away. Senators openly warned about cybersecurity risks, delayed reaction times, and the implications of foreign operators interacting with vehicles moving through U.S. cities in real time. Then Tesla testified. Tesla stated its driving controls are physically isolated, cannot be accessed remotely, firmware updates require dual cryptographic approval, and that no hacker has ever taken control of a Tesla vehicle - despite years of paid hacking attempts. Same hearing. Same risks. Two radically different systems. Why does an “autonomous” car need a human in another country anywhere near the decision chain?
[–] • 3 pts

Why does an “autonomous” car need a human in another country anywhere near the decision chain?

Because predictive engines are not actually intelligent and they probably never will be.

I’m disappointed though. I thought Waymo cars were actually driving on their own aside from occasional problems like honking incessantly and requiring tow truck drivers to come and properly close their doors for them.

I have a few questions about the Filipino remote drivers.

Waymo got legal permission to have its automated systems operate vehicles on California roads. Did that include allowing people to operate the vehicles remotely?

It’s a different set of risks. A brief connection interruption could cause a major accident.

Assuming it’s legal to remotely operate a vehicle on California roads, are these Filipinos legally licensed to do it?

[–] • 0 pt

predictive engines

That says it all, right there.

[–] • 1 pt

So if your Wayno suddenly turns into a Jollibee or a casino, we know why.