Gee. That sounds like child exploitation to me. Apple is now forfeit under Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption.
And how many of those children did Apple's current faggot CEO fuck and otherwise sexually abuse?
I bet the answer is more than zero.
I grew up with Apple. I loved Apple. I worked for Apple. I lived Apple.
But in the last ten years, things have changed substantially. Fuck Apple and their shitty politics and their shitty leadership and their shitty CEO (faggot or not).
I've always wondered about people who just make up facts and believe them. Does that come naturally or is it a learned behavior?
Haha! Nice.
But I didn’t make up anything. I offered conjecture and opinion.
Contrast this with almost any white Christian culture's take on Imperialism. The British set up schools in their African colonies and modeled some of them on ETON. Eton as in where Prince William went to school. The woke gay head of Apple is content for kids to keep losing their hands in industrial accidents, though, I guess. He's so woke and so gay and who cares about acting right. That sounds like something the homophobe Boy Scouts would promote, amirite?
It's okay to graduate from high school.
Hollywood uses child labor openly. Babies and toddlers even. Often in sexual and violent situations. Demonstrably true that child acotrs have lifelong problems due to early exploitation.
But let’s ignore that shit and talk about 14 year olds that work in a factory a few shifts a week.
There's a huge difference between something the child wants to do, and is physically easy to do, than what we consider as child labor. Being a famous actor is a common childhood dream.
Children are not in sexual or dangerous situations in Hollywood movies.
It is true some children, and adults, are treated poorly, and that should definitely be addressed.
"Children are not in sexual or dangerous situations in Hollywood movies."
IN the movies, no. They're not that blatant (yet). But outside of what you see on the screen, Hollywood is a hive of child exploitation.
Bryan Singer repeatedly abused minors on the set of Apt Pupil and likely others.
Dan Schneider abused multiple young girls in his time at Nickelodeon.
Emma Watson was one of "Harvey's girls", which is why she turned into an unhinged feminist harpy.
Amanda Bynes is completely batshit due to the repeated abuse she suffered.
Corey Haim was sexually abused as a young teenager by older actors (with some evidence suggesting it was a 19y/o Charlie Sheen).
Elijah Wood says the only reason he escaped the system was because his mother was on-set at all times, and wouldn't let him do anything that wasn't rehearsal or actual filming. Funny how he hasn't had a role since saying that.
And that's just off the top of my head.
Hollywood is a jewish child-abuse business that takes promising, wide-eyed young talent and turns them into hollow shells through repeated exploitation when the cameras aren't rolling.
It should be addressed by burning the whole fucking thing to the ground.
There are a lot of child actors who do one McDonald's commercial with no ill effects and it's a great college fund starter for them. People like Haim & Brad Renfro were picked specifically because their parents were fuckwits etc. But most child actors aren't exploited in that way. A lot of kid actors are just like extras and it's to build a college fund. There are tutors on set and they ultimately have authority over the kids. There are checks and balances and most productions have competent tutors, set medics etc around. Problems can arise when the tutor or set medic is an aspiring actor or some shit but responsible productions steer clear of that shit.
Emma Watson was not one of Harvey's girls, her big break was the Harry Potter movies and he wasn't an EP on them, David Heyman was. She worked with directors like Alfonso Cuaron who made the main 3 in the cast write essays about their characters. HP movies were probably some of the most nurturing and non-exploitive child-led movies ever. (Yes Radcliffe developed a binge drinking problem but about 90% of British men have a binge drinking problem. Also: he's fine now. He works consistently and has even done fun stuff like host HIGNFY.) JK Rowling's a teacher and a mom in addition to being a zillionaire, someone who was more powerful than any studio she worked with. She started a kids charity and she's one of the few people to speak out about the trans insanity. She's not afraid of anyone. Emma's also British - she can work forever in film & theater there. Some actors who stood up to Harvey like Jason Priestly just went home and worked there. (Priestly's Canadian) Emma's not as easy to threaten as a US based or say Eastern European actress.
One last note on JKR's power in terms of creative control. Disney and Universal were both in the running for HP at their parks. JKR was toying with the idea of having them build a train to take people to the Harry Potter area of the park. Disney hemmed and hawed, they weren't sure, it seemed like a lot of work. Universal said, Lady we'll build you whatever the fuck you want. So she went with Universal. JKR wasn't intimidated even by Disney, one of the biggest names in entertainment. That's how valuable she knows her intellectual property is. That's power even the Harveys of the world wish they had.
You start talking about something important, and then trail off into your conspiracy theories. It's a shame. You something important to say but no is ever going to take you seriously talking like that.
(post is archived)