Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

305

I thought I would do a quick web search and debunk this right off the bat. I was not successful. Now, I didn't spend a long time looking but I did check a few different search engines and had no luck disproving this.

I may have to look into this more. Seems weird.

I thought I would do a quick web search and debunk this right off the bat. I was not successful. Now, I didn't spend a long time looking but I did check a few different search engines and had no luck disproving this. I may have to look into this more. Seems weird.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (21).
[–] • 1 pt

Because the same people who installed those cameras had custody of him.

[–] • 0 pt

Nobody had custody over Lanza since he allegedly killed himself in 2012.

How come in 1999 two shooters were on full video as well as their dead corpses? That's a 13 year gap. There'd have been even more cameras filming Lanza than ever before.

[–] • 1 pt

I'm only talking about Epstein. I don't know who those other people or why you're bringing them up.

[–] • 1 pt

Because it's another example of a false flag with no evidence in the moat digitally charged and filmed era in technological history. Yet... nothing!