WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 5 pts

Someone pit this up when she was first elected but ass a jew star. Fake and gay

[–] 6 pts

Correct, it is fake. The chain is real, but the pendant that was on the end of the chain was obscured by her jacket: https://pic8.co/sh/39mHdF.jpg

[–] 1 pt

Ty. You know for a fact it's not been shopped out of that?

[–] 5 pts (edited )

Well, that specific image was posted back in June of 2019. I cropped it from the image it was part of: https://civiltascomparse.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/meloni-giorgia-chat-irc.png

Here's another of it on another site from September of 2019: https://cyberdude.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/la-draghetta-di-undernet-italia-giorgia-meloni.jpg

That image itself is available in many different places online on many different websites and posted on many different dates. They are all the same. So all of them would need to have been altered instead of just this one.

Seriously, does nobody do even a cursory image search, or even a reverse image search on things like this before they post and spread kike well-poisoning propaganda?

Yes, she sucks kike cock. Her own words make it evident. Why would our side need to make something fake when she already admits to bowing to jews?

Because our side didn't create it.

Kikes push out fake things like this because idiots spread it without checking if it is fake when even a simple check shows it is fake. They do this to make our side look retarded because anyone can do a quick search to see that it is fake. So anything we say is then discarded as fake.

I've said this before; I consider people who share kike fake propaganda without even checking if it is real as actively aiding the kikes in hurting our side. If one shows they have so little care for our side's efforts that they will actively aid the kikes' efforts against us by repeatedly sharing their fake well-poisoning propaganda, then they have shown whose side they are actually on. *(edited wording slightly to focus my statement toward this topic specifically instead of broad and ambiguous wording)

[–] 2 pts

They're the same symbol in the end though TBH. But that makes it even more pointless to shop one in for the other lol.

[–] 0 pt

How do we know this is a fake?

[–] 5 pts

Because whomever shopped it with the pendant made sure you saw the whole symbol despite the angle of the chain being such that the pendant would not want to sit where it can be seen. The chain angle indicates the lowest point of the chain droop would be below and to the right of the visible area and would completely obscure the view of the pendant. Sure the pendant could get stuck to the skin that high up, but as I said, the faker made certain you could see the whole pendant down the centerline of her body. That is a very human tell that it was faked. They want you to see it and see it in a complete and non-distracting way. By trying to make it look natural they actually made it look fake.

[–] 3 pts

isn't this proven fake news. Shouldn't it be moved?

[–] 1 pt

Should this move to fakenews (iirc) or something like that? That way it's more obvious that it's not true?

Thanks

[–] 1 pt

I already moved it here for that reason.