WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

665

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, good luck maintaining that COBOL code-base written in the 70s and still running on that mainframe, kiddo.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

Gimme that shit ill reprogram it in your choice of a dozen different languages. Think because its written in some ancient bullshit we cant learn it in 3 days. I eat languages for breakfast and shit out the Rosetta stone.

Dumb. You are working in the age of Google-able documentation. That mainframe stuff is in 2 places: 1) printed docs which largely no longer exist. 2) The heads of a bunch of gray hairs.

And even with the docs its just a harder environment in which to work. There is no ActiveRecord for dbase.

Who cares if you can't read code understand a system and reimplement it you dont deserve to call yourself a programmer. All you conveyed is that you have an undocumented system that nobody understands that will be useless as soon as one person walks out the door unless you invest in a migration.

[–] 0 pt

Mainframes are still very much a thing. 40 TB of RAM, get rekt (ibm.com)

[–] 0 pt

Your JVM isn't going to be even close to able to keep up.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Dont need the jvm rust,golang,c++ your choice. Wanna do com api c# callouts to a natively compiled cobol function we got it.