Pfff whatever
Either you're a rich kid who knows nothing about the middle class and naively think you're part of it, or you're profoundly retarded. Now maybe you live on a different planet, or maybe you're are just a britbong. You tell me.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/middle+class
The socioeconomic class between the working class and the upper class, usually including professionals, highly skilled laborers, and lower and middle management.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/upper+class
The highest socioeconomic class in a society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class#Lower_class
Lower class (occasionally described as working class) are those employed in low-paying wage jobs with very little economic security. The term "lower class" also refers to persons with low income.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class#Middle_class
The middle class is the most contested of the three categories, the broad group of people in contemporary society who fall socio-economically between the lower and upper classes.[31] One example of the contest of this term is that in the United States "middle class" is applied very broadly and includes people who would elsewhere be considered working class. Middle-class workers are sometimes called "white-collar workers".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class#Upper_class
The upper class[27] is the social class composed of those who are rich, well-born, powerful, or a combination of those. They usually wield the greatest political power. In some countries, wealth alone is sufficient to allow entry into the upper class. In others, only people who are born or marry into certain aristocratic bloodlines are considered members of the upper class and those who gain great wealth through commercial activity are looked down upon by the aristocracy as nouveau riche.
In the United Kingdom, for example, the upper classes are the aristocracy and royalty, with wealth playing a less important role in class status. Many aristocratic peerages or titles have seats attached to them, with the holder of the title (e.g. Earl of Bristol) and his family being the custodians of the house, but not the owners. Many of these require high expenditures, so wealth is typically needed. Many aristocratic peerages and their homes are parts of estates, owned and run by the title holder with moneys generated by the land, rents or other sources of wealth. However, in the United States where there is no aristocracy or royalty, the upper class status belongs to the extremely wealthy, the so-called "super-rich", though there is some tendency even in the United States for those with old family wealth to look down on those who have earned their money in business, the struggle between new money and old money.
The upper class is generally contained within the richest one or two percent of the population. Members of the upper class are often born into it and are distinguished by immense wealth which is passed from generation to generation in the form of estates.[29] Based on some new social and political theories upper class consists of the most wealthy decile group in society which holds nearly 87% of the whole society's wealth.[30]
Do you realise what you posted agrees entirely with what I said? Was that your intention or did you just not read it before you posted it?
>Do you realise what you posted agrees entirely with what I said?
Reading comprehension much?
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/middle+class
The socioeconomic class between the working class and the upper class, usually including professionals, highly skilled laborers, and lower and middle management.
There's no such thing as a middle class billionaire you fool, especially in the US
Only retarded britbongs enjoying getting fucked by the royals are led to believe this can be a thing, the joke!
I specifically said I was referring to Europe in my original post, so who gives a fuck about your “especially in the US”? You cannot be both a commoner and upper class. You can be both a commoner and a billionaire. Richard Branson and Elon Musk would both be commoner billionaires. Again, commoners cannot be upper class.
From your own post that you seemed to think contradicted me for some retarded reason:
The upper class[27] is the social class composed of those who are rich, well-born, powerful, or a combination of those.
Well-born means noble.
In the United Kingdom, for example, the upper classes are the aristocracy and royalty, with wealth playing a less important role in class status.
Applies to the vast majority of Europe, because even if we no longer maintain nobilities they are still pretty fresh in our memories. The only country this might not apply to is France, who are pretty opposed to the concept of class to begin with anyway.
You’re just wrong. Even the things you’re posting that you think support you prove you wrong. You should probably stop now.
(post is archived)